{"id":252,"date":"2011-01-03T21:17:40","date_gmt":"2011-01-03T21:17:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sagereports.com\/smart-meter-rf\/?page_id=252"},"modified":"2011-01-03T21:28:04","modified_gmt":"2011-01-03T21:28:04","slug":"appendix-c","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/sagereports.com\/smart-meter-rf\/?page_id=252","title":{"rendered":"Appendix C"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>Appendix C<\/strong><\/span> <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>Other Sources of Information on sensitivity of the eyes and testes<\/strong><\/span> In the most recent proposed revisions of RF safety standards, the IEEE  SC4 committee (2001) deliberated at length over the problem of peak  power limits and non-uniform RF exposure with respect to the eye and  testes. The quotes below come from committee drafts submitted in  response to questions from the committee moderator. <strong>ANSI\/IEEE standards adopted in 1992 (C95.1-1992) and 1999 revisions<\/strong> June 2001 SC-4 Committee Minutes These committee discussions are  informative on the issue of particular organ sensitivity to RF, and  unanswered questions and differences of opinion on the subject among  members. They discussed vulnerable organs (eyes, testes) and metallic  implants that can intensify localized RF exposures within the body and  its tissues (see also discussion on metallic implants). <em><strong>Question  20: Are there specific tissues or points within the body that have  particularly high susceptibilities to local heating due to thermal  properties in the immediate vicinity of the tissue?<\/strong><\/em> Committee  minutes include the following discussion on the particular sensitivities  of \u2018ball shaped\u2019 organs including the eyes and testes.<\/p>\n<h5>\u201c<em>Eye balls are commonly regarded as the critical organ<\/em>\u201d<\/h5>\n<h5>\u201c<em>In the range of a few GHz<\/em> (gigahertz<em>), reasonances may  occur in ball shaped eyes and testes. They are also electrically and  thermally partly insulated from other tissues. Additionally these organs  or some of their parts (lens) are thermally a little bit more  vulnerable than other tissues.\u201d<\/em><\/h5>\n<h5>\u201c<em>(m)odeling has noted that rapid changes in dialectrics such as  cerebral spinal fluid in the ventricles of the brain and surrounding  brain tissue lead to high calculated SARs. Secondly, exposure of the eye  to microwave radiation can lead to increased temperature that is  sufficient to damage tissues. The temperature rise will, of course,  depend on the intensity of the irradiation, how well the energy is  coupled into tissues, and how well the deposited energy is removed by  normal mechanisms such as conduction and blood flow. Microwaves at the  lower frequencies will be deposited deeper in the eye, while at higher  frequencies they will be absorbed near the front surface of the eye. The  eye does not efficiently remove heat deposited internally by microwave  exposure. The main avenue of heat removal is conduction and blood flow  through the retina and choroid. The lens has been thought to be the most  vulnerable tissue since it has no blood flow. Other than conduction  through the sclera and convection from the surface of the cornea, heat  removal is poor compared to other body tissues. Because the lens is  avasular it has been thought to be particularly sensitive to thermal  effects of microwave exposure. These facts have led many investigators  to postulate that the poor heat dissipation from within the eye of  humans and other animals may lead to heat buildup and subsequent thermal  damage.\u201d<\/em><\/h5>\n<h5>\u201c<em>Eyes do not have good blood circulation and testes have lower than body temperature.\u201d<\/em><\/h5>\n<h5>\u201c<em>These organs are not well-perfused, hence have been singled out for the exclusion.\u201d<\/em><\/h5>\n<h5>\u201c<em>Are the above numbers valid for all parts of the body in all  exposure conditions over the time averaging period of the exposure? They  (the basic limits) were derived in the manner you describe in body  reasonance conditions i.e. coherent exposure over the whole body length  of a human. Could the limit values of SAR be increased for partial body  exposure? Yes, but we do not have the data to make this decision. In the  near field of a source, clearly the limit value will depend on  frequency (depth of penetration), organ blood supply and tolerance of  that organism to sustain a certain rate of temperature increase during  the time averaging period and the environmental conditions. If you have  to deal with possible pathologies of organs then matters become even  more complicated, because you are dealing not only with heat physiology,  but also with general pathology, whose books are much thicker than  those on physiology.<\/em><\/h5>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Appendix C Other Sources of Information on sensitivity of the eyes and testes In the most recent proposed revisions of RF safety standards, the IEEE SC4 committee (2001) deliberated at length over the problem of peak power limits and non-uniform RF exposure with respect to the eye and testes. The quotes below come from committee [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":7,"menu_order":80,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-252","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/sagereports.com\/smart-meter-rf\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/252","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/sagereports.com\/smart-meter-rf\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/sagereports.com\/smart-meter-rf\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/sagereports.com\/smart-meter-rf\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/sagereports.com\/smart-meter-rf\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=252"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"http:\/\/sagereports.com\/smart-meter-rf\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/252\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":258,"href":"http:\/\/sagereports.com\/smart-meter-rf\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/252\/revisions\/258"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/sagereports.com\/smart-meter-rf\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/sagereports.com\/smart-meter-rf\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=252"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}